[ad_1]
Creator: DA Communications Group | 1 June 2022
The Division of Agriculture stays agency in its coverage of NO TO CORRUPTION!
We name upon everybody within the “OneDA Household,” notably those that transact enterprise as a part of their features on the DA regulatory companies to return ahead if they’ve data of any misconduct, particularly of corruption, and current proof so we will act on them with urgency.
The DA stays steadfast in our drive in opposition to graft and corruption.
As Secretary of Agriculture, I condemn within the strongest phrases smuggling and all different types of unlawful entry of all agricultural, fishery and meat merchandise into the nation — as these compete instantly with the produce of our farmers, fishers and meals producers, depriving them of much-needed livelihood and incomes.
Yesterday, we attended a Home of Representatives listening to of the Meals and Agriculture Committee to debate Home Decision No. 2282 which seeks to streamline the processes of all regulatory companies in combating smuggling.
It appeared in the course of the listening to and subsequent press stories that some DA officers are being accused of extortion by an importing entity, the Cambridge Shoppers’ Cooperative, which in flip faces allegations of technical smuggling.
As a part of our thorough investigation on the matter, we studied the criticism and administrative information of Ms. Jesusa Ascutia of the Bureau of Plant Trade Quarantine Workplace, the one being accused of extortion by Cambridge.
The 2022 extortion criticism filed by Cambridge was dismissed by the Manila Metropolis Prosecutor’s Workplace as a result of inadequate proof, quoting its decision: “The information present that the case is bereft of proof that will show the validity of the criticism.”
As a backgrounder of Ms. Ascutia’s document additionally within the Civil Service Fee (CSC), she had appealed to the CSC in 2017 her reassignment to the DA Workplace of the Secretary, which was supposedly primarily based on sure allegations of corruption. The CSC selected her favor as a result of lack of benefit for reassignment, thus ordering her reinstatement on the BPI.
This yr, Ma. Wilma Ocampo of Cambridge Shoppers Cooperative filed an extortion criticism on the Manila Metropolis Prosecutor’s Workplace in opposition to Ms. Ascutia and her group. The criticism of Ms. Ocampo was a results of the apprehension of their cargo of two container vans of greens, which Ms. Ascutia and BPI Quarantine Staff discovered misdeclared. The criticism was dismissed by the Manila Metropolis Prosecutor’s Workplace as a result of inadequate proof, as talked about above.
In closing, the DA Authorized Service continues its thorough inside investigation on the allegations, together with attainable lapses and administrative violations.
We reiterate our drive to purge this company fully of corruption. ###
[ad_2]
Source link