[ad_1]
MANILA (Reuters) – Petitioners searching for to bar Ferdinand Marcos Jr from the Philippines presidency mentioned on Friday they have been bent on preserving “autocratic figures” from energy and would use all authorized channels to cease the election frontrunner, together with the Supreme Courtroom.
Complainants didn’t persuade the Fee on Elections (COMELEC) to disqualify Marcos, 64, the son and namesake of the late Philippines dictator, on the grounds of his decades-old conviction for tax violations. Commissioners on Thursday mentioned the petitions lacked advantage.
Loretta Ann Rosales, a petitioner and one in every of 1000’s of victims of state brutality below the Nineteen Seventies-Nineteen Eighties martial regulation of the elder Marcos, mentioned opponents have been able to attraction to the best court docket.
“All measures have to be used to cease autocratic figures from profitable within the polls that will contribute to the destruction of democratic rule,” she mentioned.
Opponents of political veteran Marcos see the prospect of his household returning to the presidential palace a long time after it was overthrown in a folks’s revolt as unpalatable.
Vic Rodriguez, spokesperson for Marcos, mentioned the petitioners ought to respect courts and quasi-judicial our bodies “by not elevating lies that they’ve peddled”.
The Supreme Courtroom was required to rule on a high-profile case earlier than the final election in 2016, involving then presidential frontrunner, Grace Poe.
It reversed COMELEC’s resolution The Philippine Supreme Courtroom on Tuesday dominated {that a} senator who spent a lot of her life in the US is eligible to run for president, reversing a choice by the election fee and placing her in line to reclaim her place as frontrunner to disqualify Poe over questions on her citizenship. Poe completed third general.
Howard Calleja, a lawyer for one of many petitioners, will subsequent week file a movement asking the total bench of COMELEC to overturn the ruling of its first division.
He mentioned the choice “doesn’t put the disqualification to an in depth, however additional forged doubt not solely on the case however on the COMELEC as properly.”
(Reporting by Karen Lema; Modifying by Martin Petty)
[ad_2]
Source link